gourdsteve:

how cool would it be if there were a hyperbolic cult of womanhood to match the terrible internet worship of masculinity so we could all finally admit how shallow and awful it is.

i see strident women fistbumping over frilly dresses and decaf tea, “Womanly as hell, Babe” they say, phone-searching for the most appropriate “Most Interesting Woman In the World” memery to express their feelings.

single mother pulls off sick bargain-hunts while ripped teen boys writhe in the background, an audience of career moms whooping “SHE MUST HAVE OVARIES OF STEEL” “I BET THEY SCRAPE THE GROUND WHEN SHE SQUATS” etc. 

Epic Meal Time hosted by three dreadlocked women who toss EVERY kind of melon into a vat of yogurt. Will it blend? its madness. so womanly. god damn.

“must be motherfucking PERIODING up in here cause im about BLEED on your FACE” scream the olympic volleyball team to their russian rivals, who respond by sneaking into their dorm at night and “clambagging” each and every one of them. prankd

lots of pics of margeret thatcher riding ponys, painting her nails, trying on shoes. Womanliest. World leader. Ever. say the message boards

purplechujazzy:

I think the best part of this is that ppl are also getting mad at the writer for saying “prostate owners” and “non-prostate owners” bc it’s “reducing women to simply being ‘not a man’” and completely missing the fact that the article is written that way to be trans inclusive.

I feel that the problem is that they could’ve gone with like, prostate-owners and clit-havers if they wanted to keep it trans inclusive.

Instead, women are defined by a lack of a male-genitalia, and not only that, but the female diagram is missing the clit!!!! And that’s really gross.

They’re writing an article for a magazine with a target audience of teen girls and are missing the most pleasurable part of female genitalia!