purplechujazzy:

I think the best part of this is that ppl are also getting mad at the writer for saying “prostate owners” and “non-prostate owners” bc it’s “reducing women to simply being ‘not a man’” and completely missing the fact that the article is written that way to be trans inclusive.

I feel that the problem is that they could’ve gone with like, prostate-owners and clit-havers if they wanted to keep it trans inclusive.

Instead, women are defined by a lack of a male-genitalia, and not only that, but the female diagram is missing the clit!!!! And that’s really gross.

They’re writing an article for a magazine with a target audience of teen girls and are missing the most pleasurable part of female genitalia!